[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070111112901.28085adf.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:29:01 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Michael Reed <mdr@....com>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>,
"'Zach Brown'" <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
"'Chris Mason'" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@....com>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch] optimize o_direct on block device - v3
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:21:57 -0600
Michael Reed <mdr@....com> wrote:
> Testing on my ia64 system reveals that this patch introduces a
> data integrity error for direct i/o to a block device. Device
> errors which result in i/o failure do not propagate to the
> process issuing direct i/o to the device.
>
> This can be reproduced by doing writes to a fibre channel block
> device and then disabling the switch port connecting the host
> adapter to the switch.
>
Does this fix it?
<thwaps Ken>
<thwaps compiler>
<adds new entry to Documentation/SubmitChecklist>
diff -puN fs/block_dev.c~a fs/block_dev.c
--- a/fs/block_dev.c~a
+++ a/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int blk_end_aio(struct bio *bio,
iocb->ki_nbytes = -EIO;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(bio_count)) {
- if (iocb->ki_nbytes < 0)
+ if ((long)iocb->ki_nbytes < 0)
aio_complete(iocb, iocb->ki_nbytes, 0);
else
aio_complete(iocb, iocb->ki_left, 0);
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists