linux-kernel - Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45A5EF63.3040601@qumranet.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:03:47 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I still think that in the long term, we should migrate to
> new system calls and a special file system for kvm, which
> might be non-mountable. 

The inode-per-vm and inode-per-vcpu approach sort-of-implies a 
nonmountable special filesystem, so with the proposed change, we'll be 
halfway there.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/