[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A5F616.3040305@qumranet.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:32:22 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Stable kvm userspace interface
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 14:47, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Can we please avoid adding a ton of new ioctls? ioctls inevitably
>>> require 64-bit compat code for certain architectures, whereas
>>> sysfs/procfs does not.
>>
>> For performance reasons, an ascii string based interface is not
>> desireable here, some of these calls should be optimized to
>> the point of counting cycles.
>
> sysfs does not require ASCII...
>
The main kvm ioctl switches the execution mode to guest mode. Just like
a syscall enters kernel mode, ioctl(vcpu_fd, KVM_VCPU_RUN) enters the
guest address space and begins executing guest code.
I don't see how to model that with sysfs.
There are other objections as well. sysfs is a public interface, whereas
kvm is a process private attribute. These objections don't apply to
/proc though.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists