[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070112101931.GA11635@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:19:31 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: kvm & dyntick
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > dyntick-enabled guest:
> > - reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
> > (currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)
>
> yeah. KVM under -rt already works with dynticks enabled on both the
> host and the guest. (but it's more optimal to use a dedicated
> hypercall to set the next guest-interrupt)
using the dynticks code from the -rt kernel makes the overhead of an
idle guest go down by a factor of 10-15:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2556 mingo 15 0 598m 159m 157m R 1.5 8.0 0:26.20 qemu
( for this to work on my system i have added a 'hyper' clocksource
hypercall API for KVM guests to use - this is needed instead of the
running-to-slowly TSC. )
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists