[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070112174312.GA22771@Krystal>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:43:12 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] Linux Kernel Markers, non optimised architectures
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca) wrote:
> >
> > OK, well one problem is that it can cause a resched event to be lost, so
> > you might say it has more side-effects without checking resched.
> >
[...]
> If we are sure that we expect calls to preempt_schedule() from each of these
> contexts, then it's ok to put preempt_enable(). It is important to note that a
> marker would then act as a source of scheduler events in code paths where
> disabling interrupts is expected to disable the scheduler.
>
Sorry for self-reply, but the above mentioned issue is dealt by the
irqs_disabled() check at the beginning of preempt_schedule().
Mathieu
--
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists