[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701121455550.6844@p34.internal.lan>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:56:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Linux Software RAID 5 Performance Optimizations: 2.6.19.1:
(211MB/s read & 195MB/s write)
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
> Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > RAID 5 TWEAKED: 1:06.41 elapsed @ 60% CPU
> >
> > This should be 1:14 not 1:06(was with a similarly sized file but not the
> > same) the 1:14 is the same file as used with the other benchmarks. and to
> > get that I used 256mb read-ahead and 16384 stripe size ++ 128
> > max_sectors_kb (same size as my sw raid5 chunk size)
>
> max_sectors_kb is probably your key. On my system I get twice the read
> performance by just reducing max_sectors_kb from default 512 to 192.
>
> Can you do a fresh reboot to shell and then:
> $ cat /sys/block/hda/queue/*
> $ cat /proc/meminfo
> $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> $ dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10240
> $ echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/max_sectors_kb
> $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> $ dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10240
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Al
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Ok. sec
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists