[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A710F8.7000405@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:39:20 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com,
Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] Linux Kernel Markers, non optimised architectures
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> +#define MARK(name, format, args...) \
> + do { \
> + static marker_probe_func *__mark_call_##name = \
> + __mark_empty_function; \
> + volatile static char __marker_enable_##name = 0; \
> + static const struct __mark_marker_c __mark_c_##name \
> + __attribute__((section(".markers.c"))) = \
> + { #name, &__mark_call_##name, format } ; \
> + static const struct __mark_marker __mark_##name \
> + __attribute__((section(".markers"))) = \
> + { &__mark_c_##name, &__marker_enable_##name } ; \
> + asm volatile ( "" : : "i" (&__mark_##name)); \
> + __mark_check_format(format, ## args); \
> + if (unlikely(__marker_enable_##name)) { \
> + preempt_disable(); \
> + (*__mark_call_##name)(format, ## args); \
> + preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
Why not just preempt_enable() here?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists