[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A71DEA.9020307@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:34:34 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kvm & dyntick
Avi Kivity wrote:
> dyntick-enabled guest:
> - reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
> (currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)
You do not need dynticks for this actually. Simple no-tick-on-idle
like Xen has works well enough.
While you're modifying the timer code, you might also want to add
proper accounting for steal time. Time during which your guest
had a runnable process, but was not actually running itself, should
not be accounted against the currently running process.
I wonder if it would be possible to simply copy some of the timer
code from Xen. They have the timing quirks worked out very well
and their timer_interrupt() is pretty nice code.
(Now I need to buy myself another VT box so I can help out with KVM :))
http://virt.kernelnewbies.org/ParavirtBenefits has some other features
you may want to have :)))
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists