linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/6] containers: Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45A72AE0.9010209@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:59:52 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC:	vatsa@...ibm.com, sekharan@...ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xemul@...ru, dev@...ru, containers@...ts.osdl.org, pj@....com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/6] containers: Add generic multi-subsystem
 API to containers

Paul Menage wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> Paul Menage wrote:
>>> +/* The set of hierarchies in use. Hierarchy 0 is the "dummy
>>> + * container", reserved for the subsystems that are otherwise
>>> + * unattached - it never has more than a single container, and all
>>> + * tasks are part of that container. */
>>> +
>>> +static struct containerfs_root rootnode[CONFIG_MAX_CONTAINER_HIERARCHIES];
>>> +
>>> +/* dummytop is a shorthand for the dummy hierarchy's top container */
>>> +#define dummytop (&rootnode[0].top_container)
>>> +
>> With these changes, is there a generic way to determine the root container
>> for the hierarchy the subsystem is in? Calls to ->create() pass the dummytop
>> container.
> 
> There are two places that the subsystem create() function is called -
> the first is during the subsystem registration, to create the
> subsystem state for the root container. That one passes in dummytop
> since that is the container that all subsystems start attached to.
> 

Yes, I saw that.

> For clarification, the default (dummy) hierarchy is a placeholder for
> subsystems that aren't bound to a hierarchy. It always contains
> exactly one container (dummytop) and all processes are members of that
> container. It isn't reference-counted, since it can never go away, and
> it can never have any subcontainers.
> 
> When a real subcontainer is created (which must be after a subsystem
> has been bound to a hierarchy via a filesystem mount), the new
> subcontainer is passed in. From there you can follow the top_container
> field in the subcontainer, which leads to the root of the hierarchy.
> 
> Andrew has suggested that I need to document this better :-)
> 

One of things I was trying to do with cpu_acct was to actually calculate
the % load over a defined interval. I have the patch for that ready.
When the interval ticks over (which happens in interrupt context -
account_xxxxx_time()), I want to reset the load of child containers
to 0. To walk the hierarchy, I have no root now since I do not have
any task context. I was wondering if exporting the rootnode or providing
a function to export the rootnode of the mounter hierarchy will make
programming easier.

Something like

struct container *get_root_container(struct container_subsys *ss)
{
	return &rootnode[ss->hierarchy];
}

> Paul
> 


-- 

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/