| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45A93E97.30007@tmr.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:18:31 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu CC: Sunil Naidu <akula2.shark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Choosing a HyperThreading/SMP/MultiCore kernel ? Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said: >> I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the >> kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you need a >> distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC >> bios). As long as you can boot it, any i386 or amd64 kernel with smp >> enabled should use all the processors present (well amd64 on the >> core2duo and on the p4 if it is em64t enabled). > > amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the > lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets. I admit not knowing what > exact variant the Mac has. I don't believe that's correct, the Intel features page indicates all core2 have both 64bit and virtualization. Perhaps some of the core (no 2) models didn't? Even the old 930 had those features by my notes. > >> I believe the closest optimization for a Core2 is probably the Pentium M >> (certainly not the P4/netburst). Not entirely sure though. > > CONFIG_MCORE2=y > > That's probably even closer :) At least in 2.6.20-rc4-mm1. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists