[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701131555220.19856@squeaker.ratbox.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:55:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Aaron Sethman <androsyn@...box.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
cc: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote:
>> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> [070113 08:11]:
>>> This still leaves the old regressions we have not yet fixed...
>>> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19.
>>
>>> Subject : BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/...
>>> cdrom_{open,release,ioctl} in trace
>>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/26/105
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/22
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/31/133
>>> Submitter : Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>
>>> Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
>>> Aaron Sethman <androsyn@...box.org>
>>> Status : unknown
>>
>> I have not seen the problem since using rc3, so I guess it is ok now.
>> Maybe the commit 9414232fa0cc28e2f51b8c76d260f2748f7953fc has fixed the
>> problem, but I am not 100% sure.
>
> Thanks for this information.
>
> Jon, Aaron, can you confirm it's fixed in -rc5?
I haven't seen it in a while anyways, fwiw.
-Aaron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists