[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A96E31.3080307@student.ltu.se>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:41:37 +0100
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
>
>> Any thoughts on this is very much appreciated (is there any flaws with
>> this?).
>>
>
> The thought that crossed my mind was:
>
> Why not do the same thing that was done to the "Help"-file. (Before it
> was superseded by Kconfig).
>
> Originaly there was a central Help-file, with all the texts. Then it was
> split and placed in each sub-dir. And later it was superseded by Kconfig.
>
> On the other hand you could skip the intermediate step and just fold the
> Maintainer-data directly into Kconfig, that way everything is "in one
> place" and you could place a "Maintainers"-Button next to the
> "Help"-Button in *config, or just display it alongside the help.
>
> And MAYBE that would also lessen the "update-to-date"-problem, as you
> can just write the MAINTAINERs-data when you create/update the
> Kconfig-file. Which is a thing that creates much bigger pain when you
> forget it accidently. ;-)
>
> Oh, and it neadly solves the mapping-problem, for at least all
> kernel-parts that have a Kconfig-option/Sub-Tree.
>
I'm all for splitting up the MAINTAINERS! :)
Just, do you have any ideas how to solve the possible multiple of the
same entries, when handling multiple sub-directories and when many
different drivers with different maintainers are in the same directory
and a maintainer have more then one driver?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists