linux-kernel - Re: Choosing a HyperThreading/SMP/MultiCore kernel ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:38:43 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Cc:	Sunil Naidu <akula2.shark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Choosing a HyperThreading/SMP/MultiCore kernel ?

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
>
> I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
> kernel they use isn't too old.).  Of course if it is a Mac, you need a
> distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC
> bios).  As long as you can boot it, any i386 or amd64 kernel with smp
> enabled should use all the processors present (well amd64 on the
> core2duo and on the p4 if it is em64t enabled).

amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the
lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets.  I admit not knowing what
exact variant the Mac has.

> I believe the closest optimization for a Core2 is probably the Pentium M
> (certainly not the P4/netburst).  Not entirely sure though.

CONFIG_MCORE2=y

That's probably even closer :)  At least in 2.6.20-rc4-mm1.  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped