[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A86291.8090408@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:39:45 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>
Subject: Re: High lock spin time for zone->lru_lock under extreme conditions
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> Hi,
> We noticed high interrupt hold off times while running some memory intensive
> tests on a Sun x4600 8 socket 16 core x86_64 box. We noticed softlockups,
[...]
> We did not use any lock debugging options and used plain old rdtsc to
> measure cycles. (We disable cpu freq scaling in the BIOS). All we did was
> this:
>
> void __lockfunc _spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> local_irq_disable();
> ------------------------> rdtsc(t1);
> preempt_disable();
> spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> _raw_spin_lock(lock);
> ------------------------> rdtsc(t2);
> if (lock->spin_time < (t2 - t1))
> lock->spin_time = t2 - t1;
> }
>
> On some runs, we found that the zone->lru_lock spun for 33 seconds or more
> while the maximal CS time was 3 seconds or so.
What is the "CS time"?
It would be interesting to know how long the maximal lru_lock *hold* time is,
which could give us a better indication of whether it is a hardware problem.
For example, if the maximum hold time is 10ms, that it might indicate a
hardware fairness problem.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists