[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A89008.2030408@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:53:44 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>
Subject: Re: High lock spin time for zone->lru_lock under extreme conditions
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:39:45PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>What is the "CS time"?
>
>
> Critical Section :). This is the maximal time interval I measured from
> t2 above to the time point we release the spin lock. This is the hold
> time I guess.
>
>
>>It would be interesting to know how long the maximal lru_lock *hold* time
>>is,
>>which could give us a better indication of whether it is a hardware problem.
>>
>>For example, if the maximum hold time is 10ms, that it might indicate a
>>hardware fairness problem.
>
>
> The maximal hold time was about 3s.
Well then it doesn't seem very surprising that this could cause a 30s wait
time for one CPU in a 16 core system, regardless of fairness.
I guess most of the contention, and the lock hold times are coming from
vmscan? Do you know exactly which critical sections are the culprits?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists