| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:03:02 +0100 From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> To: icxcnika@....tar.cc, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.20-rc4: usb somehow broken Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 20:47 schrieb icxcnika@....tar.cc: > > When the scanner is not in use, the system automatically suspends it after > > two seconds. When you use sane the scanner is resumed, but it then > > disconnects itself and reconnects. Sane is left trying to control the > > disconnected device instance, so of course it fails. > > > > I'm beginning to think that we need some way to deal with devices that > > cannot recover from a suspend. Several examples have cropped up. > > Unfortunately, I can't think of anything better than a blacklist, which is > > not very satisfactory. > > > > Can anyone suggest another approach? > > > > Alan Stern > > Just a thought, you could use both a blacklist approach, and a module > paramater, or something in sysfs, to allow specifying devices that won't > be suspend and resume compatible. Yes, but in any case the sysfs attributes would have to populated somehow. You'd just shift the burden. As this behavior is hopefully rare, it's probably not worth the effort. I can't think of anything better than a blacklist. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists