[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <45AAC039.1020808@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:43:53 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, htejun@...il.com
Subject: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with 2.6.20-rc{2,4,5} (no other tested yet) I see SATA exceptions quite
> often, with 2.6.19 there are no such exceptions. dmesg and lspci -v
> output follows. In the meantime, I'll start bisecting.
...
> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> ata1.00: cmd e7/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 0 in
> res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
> ata1: soft resetting port
> ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> ata1: EH complete
> SCSI device sda: 160086528 512-byte hdwr sectors (81964 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
> SCSI device sda: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Looks like all of these errors are from a FLUSH CACHE command and the
drive is indicating that it is no longer busy, so presumably done.
That's not a DMA-mapped command, so it wouldn't go through the ADMA
machinery and I wouldn't have expected this to be handled any
differently from before. Curious..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists