[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070114074308.GC10585@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:43:08 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 20/20] XEN-paravirt: Add Xen virtual block device driver.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 05:07:28PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > +
> > +#define DPRINTK(_f, _a...) pr_debug(_f, ## _a)
>
> why this silly abstraction? Just use pr_debug in the code directly
Actually, for drivers, like this one, you should use the dev_printk()
and friends (dev_dbg, dev_err, etc.) instead so that userspace knows
exactly which device and driver the message comes from.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists