[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070114083954.GB2913@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:39:54 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: kvm & dyntick
* Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
> >( for this to work on my system i have added a 'hyper' clocksource
> > hypercall API for KVM guests to use - this is needed instead of the
> > running-to-slowly TSC. )
> >
>
> What's the problem with the TSC? The only issue I'm aware of is that
> the tsc might go backwards if the vcpu is migrated to another host cpu
> (easily fixed).
this is not a problem of KVM - this is a problem of this laptop: its TSC
stops when going idle. So the TSC is fundamentally unusable for reliable
timekeeping - and qemu doesnt offer pmtimer emulation to fall back to,
so the dyntick kernel refused to go high-res under KVM. Once i added the
hyper clocksource to fall back to, it could utilize the PIT and the
lapic for clock-events.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists