[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45ABBB64.3060304@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:35:32 +0100
From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 7/8] user_ns: handle file sigio
[ ... ]
> Rewriting the userns testcases right now. Clearly, in addition to
> separately testing clone and unshare, I need to add a sigioperm check,
> and have a separate set of testcases for CONFIG_USER_NS=n.
Could we get rid of CONFIG_USER_NS ?
It doesn't look that useful anyway, it just deactivates the unshare
capability for the user namespace.
Same question for the other mainline namespaces, IPC and utsname.
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists