[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45ABC17D.3050105@student.ltu.se>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:01:33 +0100
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
CC: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] How to (automatically) find the correct maintainer(s)
Stefan Richter wrote:
> On 15 Jan, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 Jan, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>>>
>>>> (Really liked the idea to have a "Maintainer"-button
>>>> next to "Help" in *config)
>>>>
>>> Rhetorical question: What will this button be used for?
>>>
>> Having "all(tm)" information of something in one place?
>>
>
> Or, "click here to say 'it does not work'"?
>
> My rhetorical question wasn't about what it is intended for, but what
> people would think it was intended for if it was there.
>
>
I think it could be practical to have an easy access to whom is
responsible for a driver and which mailinglist its development is
addressed to, both for people interested in helping develop the driver
and those who got an error (or fan-mail :).
>> I think adding the Maintainers-data is more or less a logical next step.
>>
>> It's not always clear from the MAINTAINERS-file who is the right person
>> for what. Especially as it is a rather large text-file with only
>> mediocre search-friendlieness. It's a 3.5 K-lines file!
>>
>> So when you know that you have a problem with drivers X, wouldn't it be
>> great if you could just "go to" the driver in *config and see not only
>> the Help-Text but the Maintainers-Data also.
>>
>
> Seems more like what you actually want to have there is links to users'
> mailinglists or forums.
>
> When this thread started, it was about assisting authors in submitting
> patches.
>
>
Yes, this is a bit out of scope, but just realized a simple way to
implement it if using the CONFIG_FLAG-approach, just "grep" after the
flag, under which the user hit the "Maintainer"-button, in the
MAINTAINER-file. Also, I think this solves the handler-problem since an
entry can have multiple CONFIG_FLAG's stated.
I don't think we should add the maintainer-entries directly in Kconfig,
as you Stefan stated, because it is for configure the kernel. With the
above approach, it will just require minor fixes in the "make *config"
to handle it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists