[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070115193103.GG32238@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:01:03 +0530
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mm PATCH 6/6] RCU: trivial fixes
Fix a few trivial things based on review comments.
Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
---
diff -puN kernel/rcupreempt.c~rcu-fix-trivials kernel/rcupreempt.c
--- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu/kernel/rcupreempt.c~rcu-fix-trivials 2007-01-15 15:37:00.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcupreempt.c 2007-01-15 15:37:00.000000000 +0530
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void __rcu_read_lock(void)
local_irq_save(oldirq);
/*
- * Outermost nesting of rcu_read_lock(), so atomically
+ * Outermost nesting of rcu_read_lock(), so
* increment the current counter for the current CPU.
*/
idx = rcu_ctrlblk.completed & 0x1;
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void __rcu_read_lock(void)
* Now that the per-CPU counter has been incremented, we
* are protected. We can therefore safely increment
* the nesting counter, relieving further NMIs of the
- * need to do so.
+ * need to increment the per-CPU counter.
*/
current->rcu_read_lock_nesting = nesting + 1;
barrier();
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists