linux-kernel - Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <45AAE635.8090308@shaw.ca>
Date:	Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:25:57 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, htejun@...il.com
Subject: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Looks like all of these errors are from a FLUSH CACHE command and the 
>> drive is indicating that it is no longer busy, so presumably done. 
>> That's not a DMA-mapped command, so it wouldn't go through the ADMA 
>> machinery and I wouldn't have expected this to be handled any 
>> differently from before. Curious..
> 
> It's possible the flush-cache command takes longer than 30 seconds, if 
> the cache is large, contents are discontiguous, etc.  It's a 
> pathological case, but possible.
> 
> Or maybe flush-cache doesn't get a 30 second timeout, and it should...? 
>  (thinking out loud)
> 
>     Jeff

If the flush was still in progress I would expect Busy to still be set, 
however..

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/