[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070117.013835.51856830.takada@mbf.nifty.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:38:35 +0900 (JST)
From: takada <takada@....nifty.com>
To: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fix typo in geode_configre()@cyrix.c
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Subject: Re: fix typo in geode_configre()@cyrix.c
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:33:48 -0500
Thank you for comments.
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:41:56PM +0900, takada wrote:
> > In kernel 2.6, write back wrong register when configure Geode processor.
> > Instead of storing to CCR4, it stores to CCR3.
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.19/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c.orig 2007-01-09 16:45:21.000000000 +0900
> > +++ linux-2.6.19/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c 2007-01-09 17:10:13.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static void __cpuinit geode_configure(vo
> > ccr4 = getCx86(CX86_CCR4);
> > ccr4 |= 0x38; /* FPU fast, DTE cache, Mem bypass */
> >
> > - setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3);
> > + setCx86(CX86_CCR4, ccr4);
> >
> > set_cx86_memwb();
> > set_cx86_reorder();
> > -
>
> One more comment on this:
>
> Why is this function using 3 different styles to do the same thing to 3
> different registers?
>
> First it does CCR2 by doing:
> setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
>
> Nice, no temp values, and it is obvious this is a permanent change.
>
> Then for the next one it does:
> ccr3 = GetCx86(CX86_CCR3);
> setCx86(CX86_CCR3, (ccr3 & 0x0f) | 0x10);
>
> Couldn't that have been:
> setCx86(CX86_CCR3, (getCx86(CX86_CCR3) & 0x0f) | 0x10);
>
> No temp variable, and again it clearly does not intend to restore the
> value again later (even though the bug actually did cause the value to
> be restored by accident).
>
> Then the last case does:
> ccr4 = GetCx86(CX86_CCR4);
> ccr4 |= 0x38;
> setCx86(CX86_CCR4, ccr4); (after fixing the typo you found of course).
>
> Why did this one have to modify the variable first before using it?
> Maybe the ccr3 and ccr4 cases would have made the line too long and
> needed wrapping, but at least those two cases should be done the same
> way. It makes it look like it was written by 3 different people who
> didn't look at the lines around the changes they were making.
You are right. I agree to your comment. These variables are needless.
I made a patch again.
diff -Narup linux-2.6.19.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c linux-2.6.19/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c 2006-11-30 06:57:37.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.19/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c 2007-01-16 19:55:05.000000000 +0900
@@ -161,19 +161,15 @@ static void __cpuinit set_cx86_inc(void)
static void __cpuinit geode_configure(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
- u8 ccr3, ccr4;
local_irq_save(flags);
/* Suspend on halt power saving and enable #SUSP pin */
setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
- ccr3 = getCx86(CX86_CCR3);
- setCx86(CX86_CCR3, (ccr3 & 0x0f) | 0x10); /* Enable */
+ setCx86(CX86_CCR3, (getCx86(CX86_CCR3) & 0x0f) | 0x10); /* Enable */
- ccr4 = getCx86(CX86_CCR4);
- ccr4 |= 0x38; /* FPU fast, DTE cache, Mem bypass */
-
- setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3);
+ /* FPU fast, DTE cache, Mem bypass */
+ setCx86(CX86_CCR4, getCx86(CX86_CCR4) | 0x30);
set_cx86_memwb();
set_cx86_reorder();
@@ -415,15 +411,14 @@ static void __cpuinit cyrix_identify(str
if (dir0 == 5 || dir0 == 3)
{
- unsigned char ccr3, ccr4;
+ unsigned char ccr3;
unsigned long flags;
printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling CPUID on Cyrix processor.\n");
local_irq_save(flags);
ccr3 = getCx86(CX86_CCR3);
- setCx86(CX86_CCR3, (ccr3 & 0x0f) | 0x10); /* enable MAPEN */
- ccr4 = getCx86(CX86_CCR4);
- setCx86(CX86_CCR4, ccr4 | 0x80); /* enable cpuid */
- setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3); /* disable MAPEN */
+ setCx86(CX86_CCR3, (ccr3 & 0x0f) | 0x10); /* enable MAPEN */
+ setCx86(CX86_CCR4, getCx86(CX86_CCR4) | 0x80); /* enable cpuid */
+ setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3); /* disable MAPEN */
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
}
>
> --
> Len Sorensen
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists