linux-kernel - Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by "IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070116.110630.60620489.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:06:30 +0900 (JST)
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	nix.or.die@...glemail.com, greg@...ah.com, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, dlstevens@...ibm.com, dsd@...too.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by "IPV4/IPV6: Fix
 inet{, 6} device initialization order."

In article <45AC3214.4080800@...glemail.com> (at Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:01:56 +0100), Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> says:

> Greg KH schrieb:
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >   
> >> From: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800
> >>
> >>     
> >>> I think it's better to add the fix than withdraw this patch, since
> >>> the original bug is a crash.
> >>>       
> >> I completely agree.
> >>     
> >
> > Great, can someone forward the patch to us?
> >   
> 
> Should be the fix from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7817

I've resent the patch to <stable@...nel.org>.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/