| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:54:23 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org> To: Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@...hat.com> Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>, trivial@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5 2/4] pvrusb2: Use ARRAY_SIZE macro Em Ter, 2007-01-16 às 20:54 +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish escreveu: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 03:36:16AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > > > > > Use ARRAY_SIZE macro in pvrusb2-hdw.c file > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...il.com> > > > > ... snip ... > > > > i'm not sure it's worth submitting multiple patches to convert code > > expressions to the ARRAY_SIZE() macro since i was going to wait for > > the next kernel release, and do that in one fell swoop with a single > > patch. > > No problem :). But will a single patch be accepted ?. Grepping the tree,I found > many results that will make the patch very very big. > Should I stop sending them till 2.6.20 ?. > If so, I've made any way about 10 patches dealing with different subsytems. > I can send them to you to avoid this little work duplication. The folded patch doesn't seem to be big. I'll apply it at development tree to be sent to 2.6.21. There's no hurry of such patch for 2.6.20. > > > Regards - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists