[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1169035248.11226.11.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:00:48 -0500
From: David Hollis <dhollis@...ehollis.com>
To: ebuddington@...leyan.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 USB (asix) problem
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 17:59 -0500, Eric Buddington wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:32:17PM +0000, David Hollis wrote:
> > Interesting. It would really be something if your devices happen to
> > work better with 0. Wouldn't make much sense at all unfortunately. If
> > 0 works, could you also try setting it to 2 or 3? The PHY select value
> > is a bit field with the 0 bit being to select the onboard PHY, and 1 bit
> > being to 'auto-select' the PHY based on link status. The data sheet
> > indicates that 3 should be the default, but all of the literature I have
> > seen from ASIX says to write a 1 to it.
>
> My hardware is ver. B1.
>
> 0, 2, and 3 all worked for me. 1, as before, does not.
>
That's good to hear. Some other patches have started floating around to
deal with these cases of internal vs. external PHY's and also seem to
work.
> 'rmmod asix' takes a really long time (45-80s) with any setting, and
> sometimes coincides with ksoftirqd pegging (99.9% CPU) for several
> seconds.
This I haven't seen before. Does it occur even when the device is able
to work (using 0 or the like from above)? This may be due to something
else in the USB subsystem or something.
--
David Hollis <dhollis@...ehollis.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists