linux-kernel - Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:28:17 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken


* Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> wrote:

> And actually the lock stuff is OK, since it's not inlined -- it's the 
> unlock stuff that goes directly to the __raw versions.  But something 
> like the following works for me; does it look OK to you?

yeah, it looks good to me too. Hopefully this will work with the include 
file ordering of all platforms.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/