[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0701180648r1dfa03bej5b8fb547c8d1d2e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:48:11 +0200
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com>
To: "Bernhard Walle" <bwalle@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm
On 1/18/07, Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:58:52PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > 2. Set command_line as __initdata.
>
> You can't.
>
> > -static char command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
> > +static char __initdata command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
>
> Uninitialised data is placed in the BSS. Adding __initdata to BSS
> data causes grief.
Thanks for the reply!
There are many places in kernel that uses __initdata for uninitialized
variables.
For example:
./drivers/ide/ide.c:static int __initdata probe_ali14xx;
./drivers/ide/ide.c:static int __initdata probe_umc8672;
./drivers/ide/ide.c:static int __initdata probe_dtc2278;
./drivers/ide/ide.c:static int __initdata probe_ht6560b;
./drivers/ide/ide.c:static int __initdata probe_qd65xx;
static int __initdata is_chipset_set[MAX_HWIFS];
So all these current places are wrong?
If I initialize the data will it be OK.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists