[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070117203421.6d80be93.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:34:21 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Seetharam Dharmosoth <seetharam_kernel@...oo.co.in>
Cc: Erik Mouw <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: query related to serial console
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:10:17 +0000 (GMT) Seetharam Dharmosoth wrote:
(please don't top-post)
> Generally sysrq will work with serial console right?
>
> suppose system is connected through serial port to the
> other system, (ie serial console), at this time we can
> fire some set of commands through the serial console.
>
> the sequesnce is as follows
> do ctrl+]
> send brk
> then some commands
>
> What is my question is con't we pass commands directly
>
> to the console (without send brk signal) ?
>
> This is a feature in Solris..
>
> I am looking in Linux but, uable to find it.
>
> can you please help me
>
> Thanks
> Seetharam
Hi,
It's quite possible that I misunderstand your question,
but anyway:
Alt-Sysrq-<key> is a route into the kernel sysrq handler instead
of a route into the shell that the serial console is connected to,
so something needs to signal that condition (like a BREAK).
Or a specialized (serial) console app could know other ways of
recognizing sysrq keys. Or you could use /proc/sysrq-trigger:
echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> --- Erik Mouw <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:26:54AM +0000, Seetharam
> > Dharmosoth wrote:
> > > Is Linux having 'non-break interface for serial
> > > console' ?
> >
> > No idea. Could you explain what a 'non-break
> > interface for serial
> > console' is?
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists