linux-kernel - Re: after effects of a kernel API change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070118051026.GA29695@Ahmed>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:10:26 +0200
From:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Rodrick <daniel.rodrick@...il.com>
Cc:	kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
	Linux Newbie <linux-newbie@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: after effects of a kernel API change

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:45:04AM +0530, Daniel Rodrick wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> Whenever there is a change in the kernel API (or a new API is
> introduced), all of the drivers that use the older API need to be
> changed (or recommended to be changed). I believe it is the
> responsibility of the person changing the kernel API, to change all
> the drivers that have found their way into the kernel code?
> 
> How does this happen? Because the person who brought the change in the
> API might not know the internals of all the drivers?
> 
> Is there any way volunteers like me can help in this exercise?

See the /APIchanges in the Kernel Janitors TODO list
http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelJanitors/Todo

Also: Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt

-- 
Ahmed S. Darwish
http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/