[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070119173612.GP9093@stusta.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:36:12 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can someone explain "inline" once and for all?
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:15:03PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>...
> That's still a long way ahead (the 4.3 development cycle has just
> started), but it wouldn't hurt to start fixing incompatibilities
> sooner rather than later, and coming up with a clean and uniform set
> of inline macros that express intended meaning for the kernel to use.
I had already removed most of the "extern inline"s in the kernel since
they give warnings with -Wmissing-prototypes (which I'd like to enable
long-term in the kernel since it helps discovering a class of nasty
runtime errors).
As far as I can see, all we need is "static inline" with the semantics
"force inlining" for functions in header files and perhaps a handful of
functions in C files (if any).
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists