| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1169234620.3055.563.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:23:40 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Brian McGrew <brian@...ionpro.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fedora-users@...at.com Subject: Re: Threading... > > And on FC5 I am using pthread_self but my problem isn't simply with > pthread_self, it's with the scheduling. maybe your kernel has a broken scheduler loadbalancing? you really shouldn't have to do this manually. At all. > On FC3 both threads run > simultaneously in almost symmetric parallel. On FC5 one thread don't pick > up and start until the previous one is done. On FC3, using getpid for the > thread I could use set_afinity to force each thread to its own processor and > with FC5 I can't; so I've got one idle processor all the time. again you can use gettid() or pthread_self() in that call (but remember it's a bitmask not a number); but really you shouldn't have to do this. Try a kernel which has a non-broken load balancer? -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists