linux-kernel - Re: can someone explain "inline" once and for all?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701190858300.25621@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:00:38 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
cc:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can someone explain "inline" once and for all?

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> writes:
>
> > but in terms of strict C89 compatibility, it would seem to be a bit
> > late for that given:
> >
> >   $ grep -r "static inline " .
> >
> > no?
>
> The kernel does not use strict C89, it uses GNUC89.

  in that case, why did you just waste my time and all that bandwidth
by writing in your previous post:

"... so you need to use a different spelling when you want to stay
compatible with strict C89."

  please do me a favour and don't post another reply until you go back
and actually read my original question.

rday
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/