linux-kernel - Re: Abysmal disk performance, how to debug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:42:42 +0530
From:	"Sunil Naidu" <akula2.shark@...il.com>
To:	"Tim Schmielau" <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
Cc:	"Ismail Dönmez" <ismail@...dus.org.tr>,
	"Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Abysmal disk performance, how to debug?

On 1/21/07, Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de> wrote:
>
> Note that these dd "benchmarks" are completely bogus, because the data
> doesn't actually get written to disk in that time. For some enlightening
> data, try
>
>   time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024; time sync
>
> The dd returns as soon as all data could be buffered in RAM. Only sync
> will show how long it takes to actually write out the data to disk.
> also explains why you see better results is writeout starts earlier.

I am still getting better I feel:

[sukhoi@...hoon ~]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024; time sync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.5007 seconds, 55.1 MB/s

real    0m20.439s
user    0m0.004s
sys     0m4.535s

real    0m4.625s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.125s


[sukhoi@...hoon ~]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024 | sync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.8707 seconds, 51.4 MB/s

real    0m22.449s
user    0m0.002s
sys     0m4.922s


Linux used here is not 2.6.20-rc5, but it's a FC6 2.6.19 binary. Shall
post the results with 2.6.20-rc5.

BTW, does the results vary with a customized kernel (configured w.r.t
Processor & Hardware) than a generic kernel like FC6?

Are there any other such test cases?

>
> Tim
>

Thanks,

~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/