[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070120035204.GB30774@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:52:04 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/10] mm: be sure to trim blocks
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:14:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > buf, bytes);
> > > @@ -1935,10 +1922,9 @@ generic_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb
> > > cur_iov, iov_offset, bytes);
> > > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > > status = a_ops->commit_write(file, page, offset, offset+bytes);
> > > - if (status == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE) {
> > > - page_cache_release(page);
> > > - continue;
> > > - }
> > > + if (unlikely(status))
> > > + goto fs_write_aop_error;
> > > +
> >
> > I don't think this is correct, see how status >= 0 is used a few lines
> > downwards. Perhaps something along the lines of an
> > is_positive_aop_return() to test on?
>
> Hmm, if commit_write() will never return non error positive values then
> this and 8/10 look sane.
It's really ugly, but it looks like at least some filesystems do. So
I'll fix up this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists