[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070120061818.GA22220@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:18:18 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: dann frazier <dannf@...nf.org>
Cc: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@...ian.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:05:44PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
(...)
> Ah, think I see the problem now:
>
> --- kernel-source-2.4.27.orig/fs/smbfs/proc.c 2007-01-19 17:53:57.247695476 -0700
> +++ kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/smbfs/proc.c 2007-01-19 17:49:07.480161733 -0700
> @@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@
> fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->dir_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO)) | S_IFDIR;
> else if ( (server->mnt->flags & SMB_MOUNT_FMODE) &&
> !(S_ISDIR(fattr->f_mode)) )
> - fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->file_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO)) | S_IFREG;
> + fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->file_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO)) | (fattr->f_mode & S_IFMT);
>
> }
>
> Santiago: Thanks for reporting this - can you test this patch out on
> your system and let me know if there are still any problems?
>
> Willy: I'll do some more testing and get you a patch that fixes this
> and the double assignment nonsense. Would you prefer a single patch or
> two?
Since the double assignment is not a bug per se, don't bother making a
separate patch, put everything in the same one.
Thanks a lot for your very fast response !
Cheers,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists