linux-kernel - Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070121045437.GA7387@atjola.homenet>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:54:38 +0100
From:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, Chr <chunkeey@....de>,
	Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, htejun@...il.com,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, lwalton@...l.com
Subject: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

On 2007.01.20 22:34:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
> >change in 2.6.20-rc is either causing or triggering this problem. It 
> >would be useful if you could try git bisect between 2.6.19 and 
> >2.6.20-rc5, keeping the latest sata_nv.c each time, and see if that 
> 
> 
> Yes, 'git bisect' would be the next step in figuring out this puzzle.
> 
> Anybody up for it?

I'll go for it, but could I get an explanation how that could lead to a
different result than my last bisection? I see the difference of keeping
sata_nv.c but my brain can't wrap around it right now (woke up in the
middle of the night and still not up to speed...).

Thanks,
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/