[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <005101c73d4e$6bbf96d0$10eca8c0@grendel>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:22:20 +0100
From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@...s.com>
To: "Sunil Naidu" <akula2.shark@...il.com>,
"Ralf Baechle" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"sathesh babu" <sathesh_edara2003@...oo.co.in>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Running Linux on FPGA
> > The overhead of timer interrupts at this low clockrate is significant
> > so I recommend to minimize the timer interrupt rate as far as possible.
> > This is really a tradeoff between latency and overhead and matters
> > much less on hardcores which run at hundreds of MHz. For power sensitive
> > applications lowering the interrupt rate can also help. And that's alredy
> > pretty much what you need to know, that is a 10ms timer is fine.
> >
>
> I have worked with FPGA Linux system which is reconfigurable
> on-the-fly by the 200Mhz ARM9 CPU running Debian Linux, Altera Cyclone
> II FPGA is included on my TS-7300 board. Advantage is, Altera FPGA and
> a dedicated high-speed bus between the CPU and FPGA provides a good
> design scope to provide many solutions.
What's your point here? A 200MHz hard ore won't see the issues
under discussion. We're talking about systems where the CPU itself
is "soft" and implemented in an FPGA.
Regards,
Kevin K.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists