[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701221756000.317@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:58:42 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
cc: Eduard Bloch <edi@....de>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
Tony Foiani <tkil@...ye.com>,
Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Schwartz <davids@...master.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
On Jan 22 2007 10:53, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> You talk for everybody, or is it just your (and only your) mind refusing
>> to accept new terms? For my taste, kib and mib are even easier to
>> speech, easier than {KiLoBytE} resp. {MeGaBytE} or KaaaBe / eMmmBe.
>
>There is too much legacy code and systems around for it to ever be
>nonambiguous. It is too late to fix it, and the units that this
>"standard" came up with just sound too stupid to be taken seriously.
For "F"s sake, when you gotta use abbreviations, then just use k=1000 and
K=1024 already, b for bits and B for bytes. Problem gone.
>You also don't pronounce units just because it looks like you can. So
>KiB is not easier than KB. Heck most people in speach wouild just call
>them Ks (kays or something like that). And MBs just become Megs. Same
kegs perhaps? :)
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists