[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871wlnq7ue.wl@betelheise.deep.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:39:21 +0300
From: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@...lingofgreen.ru>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@...lingofgreen.ru>,
David Wagner <daw@...berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Undo some of the pseudo-security madness
At Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:20:21 -0500,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:23:30 +0300, Samium Gromoff said:
> >
> > not "core-dumps" but "core files", in the lispspeak, but anyway.
> >
> > the reason is trivial -- if i can write programs enjoying setuid
> > privileges in C, i want to be able to do the same in Lisp.
>
> Go read up on how the XEmacs crew designed their "portable dumper",
> specifically to get around a lot of these sorts of problems because the
> old Emacs 'unexec' code was incredibly fragile.
I should take the freedom to respond in your manner :-)
Are you saying that the usefulness of AS randomisation is
overall exceeding that of MAP_FIXED, and the latter should be
abolished?
Did we silently enter an era where support for buggy software
is more important than a basic mmap feature?
> > the only way to achieve this i see, is to directly setuid root
> > the lisp system executable itself -- because the lisp code
> > is read, compiled and executed in the process of the lisp
> > system executable.
>
> If that's the only way you can see to do it, maybe you should think a
> bit harder before making kernel hacks to do something.
I want equal grounds for platforms, that`s all.
regards, Samium Gromoff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists