[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45B4A76A.4070102@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:00:42 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
CC: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
>>Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>>
>>>by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to
>>>types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over
>>>100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the
>>>source tree. you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and
>>>hundreds of *uses* of TRUE and FALSE (not yet, anyway) but, at the
>>>very least, by adding two lines to types.h, you can delete all
>>>those redundant *definitions* and make sure that nothing breaks.
>>>(it shouldn't, of course, but it's always nice to be sure.)
>>
>>Doesn't seem very worthwhile, and it legitimises this definition
>>we're trying to get rid of.
>
>
> hmmmmmmmm ... apparently, you totally missed my use of the important
> word "temporarily":
No, I didn't.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists