| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:29:52 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>, Niki Hammler <mailinglists@...aq.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: Why active list and inactive list? On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 18:03 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > What happened to all those advanced page replacement endeavors? They are here: http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/page-replace/2.6.19-pr1/ I should update to .20 soonish. > What is the most promising of those? I'm still torn between CLOCK-Pro and CART. CLOCK-Pro is still vulnerable to the cyclic scan use case, since at that time all pages will have equal distance. CART might be fixable (my CART-r approach) but I still have to study the full ramifications of that (does it hurt other workloads?). Both seems quite capable to distinguish between recency and frequency. Neither use this horrid swappiness knob to distinguish between mapped and unmapped pages. The main problem I'm having is test cases, notably the lack thereof. (and lack of time ofcourse ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists