[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070123.101011.25910575.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:10:11 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: david-b@...bell.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hcegtvedt@...el.com, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5] SPI: alternative fix for
spi_busnum_to_master
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:12:02 -0800, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> > Here is a revised version. The children list of spi_master_class
> > contains only spi_master class so we can just compare bus_num member
> > instead of class_id string.
>
> Looks just a bit iffy ... though, thanks for helping to finally
> sort this out!
Well, so previous patch (which was checking class_id string) would be
preferred?
> > + cdev = class_device_get(cdev);
> > + if (!cdev)
> > + continue;
>
> That "continue" case doesn't seem like it should be possible... but
> at any rate, the "get" can be deferred until the relevent class
> device is known, since that _valid_ handle can't disappear so long
> as that semaphore is held. And if you find the right device but
> can't get a reference ... no point in continuing!
>
> Something like a class_find_device() would be the best way to solve
> this sort of problem, IMO. But we don't have one of those. :(
Indeed the check can be omitted. Should I send a new patch just
moving class_device_get() into "if (master->bus_num == bus_num)"
block?
The crashing with udev is 2.6.20 regression so I wish this fixed very
soon. Thank you for review.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists