[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45B686EB.60508@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:06:35 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>,
Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>, shemminger@...l.org,
csnook@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, atl1-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500
>> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>> IMHO the MSI disabling should be removed from drivers and be done
>>>> in the PCI core.
>>> That is the consensus opinion.
>>>
>>> Currently drivers implement the MSI tests because the core PCI code
>>> hasn't been up to snuff. I (and others) have been discouraging that,
>>> but when a user faces a choice between working and non-working
>>> network, the pragmatic solution wins.
>
> Linus's remark (IIRC) was to not enable CONFIG_PCI_MSI then.
Most distros, especially cutting edge ones like Fedora, will enable
CONFIG_PCI_MSI.
>>> All efforts to get us to the point where we can remove the MSI tests
>>> from drivers are strongly supported...
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>
>> So far, either MSI works for all devices or is broken, so it makes
>> sense to have a "msi=off" boot option (if there isn't already)
>>
> There is one, but it's spelled "pci=nomsi".
Yep. Thanks for repeating this, and refreshing the collective memory.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists