[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1169593808.18437.4.camel@areia>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:10:08 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] videobuf_qbuf: fix? possible videobuf_queue->stream
corruption and lockup
Em Ter, 2007-01-23 às 20:57 +0300, Oleg Nesterov escreveu:
> I am pretty sure the bug is real, but the patch may be wrong, please review.
>
> We are doing ->buf_prepare(buf) before adding buf to q->stream list. This
> means that videobuf_qbuf() should not try to re-add a STATE_PREPARED buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Chris/Adrian,
IMO, this should also be applied at -stable trees.
>
> --- 6.19/drivers/media/video/video-buf.c~v4l_lockup 2006-11-17 19:42:25.000000000 +0300
> +++ 6.19/drivers/media/video/video-buf.c 2007-01-23 19:44:19.000000000 +0300
> @@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ videobuf_qbuf(struct videobuf_queue *q,
> goto done;
> }
> if (buf->state == STATE_QUEUED ||
> + buf->state == STATE_PREPARED ||
> buf->state == STATE_ACTIVE) {
> dprintk(1,"qbuf: buffer is already queued or active.\n");
> goto done;
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists