[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45B72C7A.90803@bull.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:52:58 +0100
From: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Jean Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/5][AIO] - Add listio syscall support
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:55:54 +0100
> Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net> wrote:
>
>> +struct lio_event *lio_create(struct sigevent __user *user_event,
>> + int mode)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + struct lio_event *lio = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely((mode == LIO_NOWAIT) && !user_event))
>> + return lio;
>> +
>> + lio = kzalloc(sizeof(*lio), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + if (!lio)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
>> +
>
> Why EAGAIN and not ENOMEM?
According to the POSIX AIO specifications:
"ERRORS:
...
[EAGAIN]
The resources necessary to queue all the I/O requests were not available. "
I think memory is "a resource necessary to queue all the I/O requests"...
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/lio_listio.html
Regards,
Laurent
--
------------- Laurent.Vivier@...l.net --------------
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists