[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070124172445.GA1145@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:24:45 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] order of lockdep off/on in vprintk() should be changed
The order of locking between lockdep_off/on() and local_irq_save/restore() in
vprintk() should be changed.
* In kernel/printk.c :
vprintk() does :
preempt_disable()
local_irq_save()
lockdep_off()
spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)
spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock)
if(!down_trylock(&console_sem))
up(&console_sem)
lockdep_on()
local_irq_restore()
preempt_enable()
The goals here is to make sure we do not call printk() recursively from
kernel/lockdep.c:__lock_acquire() (called from spin_* and down/up) nor from
kernel/lockdep.c:trace_hardirqs_on/off() (called from local_irq_restore/save).
It can then potentially call printk() through mark_held_locks/mark_lock.
It correctly protects against the spin_lock call and the up/down call, but it
does not protect against local_irq_restore. It could cause infinite recursive
printk/trace_hardirqs_on() calls when printk() is called from the
mark_lock() error handing path.
We should change the locking so it becomes correct :
preempt_disable()
lockdep_off()
local_irq_save()
spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)
spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock)
if(!down_trylock(&console_sem))
up(&console_sem)
local_irq_restore()
lockdep_on()
preempt_enable()
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -530,8 +530,8 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
zap_locks();
/* This stops the holder of console_sem just where we want him */
- local_irq_save(flags);
lockdep_off();
+ local_irq_save(flags);
spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
printk_cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -640,8 +640,8 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
console_locked = 0;
up(&console_sem);
}
- lockdep_on();
local_irq_restore(flags);
+ lockdep_on();
} else {
/*
* Someone else owns the drivers. We drop the spinlock, which
@@ -650,8 +650,8 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
*/
printk_cpu = UINT_MAX;
spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
- lockdep_on();
local_irq_restore(flags);
+ lockdep_on();
}
preempt_enable();
--
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists