[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <239813.31714.qm@web36606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:24:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@....com>,
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@...gai.gr.jp>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friedhoff <chris@...edhoff.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities
--- Bill O'Donnell <billodo@....com> wrote:
> ... That said, can one expect, through
> the use of these enhanced capabilities,
> to be able to add some finer grain
> capabilities based on a specific userid?
POSIX capabilities are explictly disjoint from
userids in the kernel, and this is by design.
You could provide limited capability sets to
users at the application layer.
> In Chris' ping example,
> the suid is removed from /bin/ping to restrict it to
> root, and a
> capability added to allow any user to execute it.
> Can that example
> be extended to make it so only a _particular_ user
> can execute it?
Give the file the capability and set an
ACL that allows only that user execute access.
> I realize with SELinux, one could achieve the goal,
> but as a stopgap,
> can capabilities be used to get there?
Certainly, as above.
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill O'Donnell
> SGI
Have a look in /etc/irix.cap on a Trix box
some time. I suspect there might be one in
your facility.
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists