| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:07:01 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> Subject: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote: > To lessen Andrews burden it would be wise to integrate the two trees > prior to anything going into -mm .. [...] i disagree. Thomas' tree has been tested in -rt for some time already, and he's the author of this code so as far as i'm concerned he calls the shots of what to do and in what order to do. He did the overwhelming majority of regression fixes of dynticks/hrt stuff both in -mm and in -rt. So why should i not take his queue over yours? Last i checked your queue didnt really do anything substantial to the code - other than shuffling around wast amounts of code around. Even this latest iteration from Thomas that is now in -rt is working well on the target platform we are aiming for currently (i686). (and it's working on x86_64 as well in -rt) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists